The first one is the universal KWL chart. The authors shared the importance of using a KWL chart because we, as educators, do know the importance of the student’s background knowledge in facilitating an understanding of what is to be learned. The authors discussed research on schema theory and that people will understand what they read as it relates to what they already know. Prior knowledge becomes crucial to the successful construction of meaning for learners. The authors continued to share two types of prior knowledge.
1.
Overall prior knowledge- This is all
the knowledge that student’s possesses. This develops from student’s
experiences at home (primary Discourse) and at school (secondary Discourse).
2.
Text specific knowledge- This is the
specific information needed to understand a particular topic or theme developed
through types of text and about the topic. Learning this knowledge comes from
extensive reading, viewing programs, field trips, discussion and
demonstrations. (usually secondary discourse for many students)
This where the importance of a KWL chart comes in when reading nonfiction text, because this graphic organizer can help guide a student while reading and organize information they do in fact know, the questions they have, etc.
In my experiences with nonfiction text, I have read a lot of work by Tony Stead. He suggests that you take the traditional KWL further because he feels the more traditional graphic organizer limits learners in their thinking and experiencing nonfiction text. He calls his chart the RAN chart. (reading and analyzing nonfiction) There are five categories that are connected and lead into the next. This organizer is designed to help prompt the reader to locate new content within the text which examines, strengthens and clarifies their background knowledge. Tony Stead believes that when children come with many misconceptions about the content, write them in the Know column, there usually is not an opportunity to clear them up. So he created this chart. You can organize it in columns just like the KWL chart.
1.
What I think I
know
(think being the key word)
2.
Confirmed (or yes, you were right)
3.
Misconceptions
4.
New information learned
5.
Wonderings (questions)
I
have found this chart to be extremely beneficial in assisting the students in
organizing their thinking as well as any misconceptions they had and how to
clear them up. There are many other strategies listed that I may briefly touch
on in my last blog along with writing in expository text.
I really like the misconceptions part. I am finding I have a lot of those while going through this course. Are you familiar with KWHL charts? The H being 'How will I learn this'. I've never used it and was wondering if you've had any success with it.
ReplyDeleteI am not familiar with but I can see how you could just add that to the above. I really like that!
ReplyDeleteI have worked with KWL charts before in another class in my undergrad studies, and have found from what I am reading that these are really over used. I know that it's something that is easy and helps the students to develop their thinking. I have read of other types of activities like this, but agree with you that this has to be the most beneficial method.
ReplyDeleteI love the new approach to KWL, especially the misconceptions section. I almost feel like there is a mini-lesson to be had in analyzing the misconceptions: Where did I learn this? What is at stake with this misinformation? How did I figure out I was wrong? How did it make me feel? By the time students are sophomores in high school (those wise philosophers THINK they know everything!) it's difficult to have students poke and prod their own thinking, but an exercise like this could really help!
ReplyDeleteGreat idea... thank you for sharing! I am going to try this with my kiddos!
DeleteI like the revisions and additions to the KWL- I've always felt that the traditional KWL was too simple and not very thought-provoking.
ReplyDeleteI've never thought about 2 types of prior knowledge. Great insight. Tony Stead's work is great. He does take it to a much deeper level, one in which students really dig into a text to create a new level of understanding. Thanks for reminding me how great he is.
ReplyDelete